On the need to contextualise the English Defence League


The Golden Dawn are a Greek neo-Nazi political party who until recently were largely unheard of in Europe more widely, but who now have 21 seats in the Greek parliament following last week’s election. Their leader, Nikolaos Mihaloliakos, claims his top priority is to rid the country of immigrants. Although they deny being a neo-Nazi group, it doesn’t take a genius to see what may have inspired their emblem. They wear black shirts, wave flags and even salute. They are the most brazenly fascist of all the rising far-right movements across Europe, but should they be seen as a manifestation of Greece’s unique and terrible economic circumstances or as part of a wider rise of the far-right?

Their rise should not come as a surprise. Greece is suffering more than any other European country. Greece has been vilified as lazy, greedy and stupid not only by the media of major European countries but by the governments as well. As we all know, in the UK parliament ‘ending up like Greece’ is a byword for failure. The failure of the European Union to accommodate for all member states and diverse economies has led to Greece’s humiliation and degradation; it is understandable that reactionary nationalism has taken hold of some people. One can’t help but notice the similarities between the ‘deal’ forced upon Greece and the Treaty of Versailles, they both completely overlooked how ordinary people (who were not to blame for the mistakes of politicians and financiers) would be effected.

However it would be lazy and dangerous to simply brush off the rise of Golden Dawn as a result of poverty, unemployment and depression, as solely a reaction to EU austerity measures. A willingness to embrace the far-right has swept Europe in the last decade. The Front Nationale in France is an obvious example, who for the first time ever became a major political force in the election last week. Although Marine Le Pen’s party is a far more family-friendly version of her father’s neo-fascist Front Nationale, their rise signifies a willingness to embrace a party which has its roots in fascism. Golden Dawn are far more extreme than Marine Le Pen, but their shared values are ones previously thought to be confined to the 20th century.

The surge of the far-right hasn’t been restricted to countries in dire economic situations; even Europe’s most successful economy has seen a resurgence of ultra-nationalism. In Germany, a group called The Immortals march the streets at night. They campaign on a platform of anti-capitalism, they are anti-democratic, and most harrowingly they warn of a future Germany in which the German people will be extinct. They wear black cloaks, masks, and carry fire. Last year it was reported that a village in Germany had been entirely overrun by neo-Nazi’s and has stylised itself as such. Through intimidating other villagers and welcoming other Nazi’s, Jamel is now a village adorned with neo-Nazi symbolism where children give the Hitler salute in the street. Little has been done about this. The NDP, the German far-right party often accused of neo-Nazism, has seen increasing success in some local elections.

Perhaps it is now time to take a look at our own ‘immortals.’ Many people have characterised the rise of the English Defence League as a part of football culture, and many openly support their stated causes. Importantly the EDL are not anti-democratic or anti-capitalist, they do not use imagery from past fascist groups. They are thus deemed tolerable to middle England. However their differences to European groups are unsurprising, British nationalism is rooted in the WW2 mind-set which depicts Britain as the anti-Nazi hero. The fact that they don’t use traditional Nazi symbols doesn’t exonerate the fact that their preaches echo those of Golden Dawn and the Immortals. They are aggressively, intensely and violently islamophobic and anti-immigrant. Their marches characterised by racist chanting, their members violently intimidate people who don’t fit their specifications.

Here in Britain we need to take the rise of the far-right every bit as seriously as they should in Germany or Greece, in Austria or Italy. Although it was an unsuccessful attempt that was mocked by the media, the EDL tried to form a pan-European far-right coalition recently in Denmark. Undoubtedly they will try again. We can no longer afford to give the English Defence League the benefit of the doubt, affording them the excuse of being merely a reaction to Islamic extremism. They represent nothing less than the British manifestation of an extremely concerning rightward shift in Europe; in the globalised age of the internet we shouldn’t separate Anders Behring Breivik from Golden Dawn or the EDL from the Immortals. Britain has just as much responsibility to tackle the far right as her European neighbours.

All aboard the Blair-Bashing Bandwagon!


It’s not very often that the readers of the Daily Mail and the Guardian agree on anything, but Blair-hating is one of them. It almost feels as if they are competition to see who can hate Blair the most. Both the Guardian and the Daily Mail have run polls on whether the return of Blair to UK politics would be a good thing, and in both cases voters have overwhelmingly given him the thumbs down (though the Mail slightly more so). Furthermore, the top rated comments on both articles say the same thing: Blair should stand trial for war crimes.

Norman Tebbit has reportedly decried Blair’s legacy as one of ‘debt, war, ignorance, welfare dependency and social division.’ To me this sounds far more like the legacy of Thatcher and Major than Blair. A Thatcherite minister accusing Labour of causing social division is a bit like if a dog were to deficate on your lawn and then accuse you of doing it. Firstly, you saw the dog do it. Secondly, its in the dogs nature to do such a thing. In 1992, about two and a half million claimed benefits, and this figure rose to nearly three million in 1993. At its highest count under Labour it stood in 2009 at just over one and a half million. The popular right wing media myth of a nation of benefit scroungers under Labour persists in spite of the actual figures.

Tebbit’s assertion that Blair and Labour left a legacy of war goes beyond belief considering that his party strongly supported every military action that Blair undertook. Had the Conservatives been in power in 2001 and 2003 Afghanistan and Iraq would have certainly still happened, and most Tory MPs voted in favour of them. For a man who is supposed to be a ‘lord’ this is a very low, dishonest form of politics. At least most Guardian readers can credibly say that they were against the war, some of them possibly campaigned against it. The likelihood is that many more of the Daily Mail readers, like the newspaper, and like Cameron and the Tories, supported Iraq.

The Mail was like the sneering, encouraging friend of the playground bully who when hauled before the headmaster insists ‘I told him not to!’

Furthermore, that a top politician of the Thatcher years would accuse any other government of causing ‘social division’ is frankly beyond belief. These were the years in which trade union members were vilified as the ‘enemy within,’ the richest in society became enormously richer and entire areas of Britain were consigned to the scrapheap. The social division we have today where large areas of the country remain sink estates is a legacy of the previous Tory government, and one that Blair and Labour should have gone to more effort to sort out.

It has become very unfashionable to like Tony Blair, and very fashionable to hate him and call him a war criminal, on both sides of the spectrum. There’s no doubt that Iraq was a terrible mistake, and one which prevented me from voting Labour in 2010 and may well prevent me from voting for them in 2015 unless they adopt some kind of party policy to prevent it happening again. But let’s not forget that Blair won two elections with landslide victories, and another clear victory after that. He was one of the most popular politicians in British history. It seems that those who supported him, and supported Iraq, have either lost their tongues in recent years or would rather simply pretend that they didn’t. There were plenty of them around.